Print Articles vs. Online articles...which one is better?

March Madness is among is and everywhere you look you are seeing stories and signs dealing with the very awaited NCAA Basketball Tournaments. Brackets are being filled and people are losing sleep over the anticipated wins. Print articles and online articles can tend to be different. I examined an article from USA Today, and I looked over an online blog dealing with the NCAA Tournaments. Both differ greatly in the layout, style, and speech. The USA Today article I found is from today, March 30Th, 2006. The name of the article is, "For Players' Parents, few Perks from NCAA", by Steve Weiberg. The article is featured on the front page of the newspaper and has graphics of basketballs and a colored picture of the crowd at an NCAA game. I used Google to search for an NCAA Basketball blog, and found a great one at, http://frontier.cincinnati.com/blogs/ncaa/. This blog is produced by Dustin Dow, and Jennifer Scroggins. The blog, titled, "NCAA Hoops Blog", has been around since March of 2005. The layout of the blog is different from the newspaper article, being that it is online text and you can scroll down instead of turn a page, however it's not that different. Their layout is basic with the text of their posts, each one having a title and a date with it. The one thing that is different about the layout of the blog is that it doesn't have any visuals with it, photos and such, like the print article did. Although the layouts don't differ that much, the tone and the way the articles are written do differ. With an online blog, of course the tone is going to be more relaxed than a print article in a well established newspaper. In the NCAA blog, Dow talks about personal experiences too, which is a big difference. Authors of print articles are getting paid to just deliver the news, but blogs deliver news on a more personal level, we actually know a little bit about the author, and know their views on certain things. Blog articles on this page also are short, compared to the longer articles you will find in the newspapers. With the growing of technology, there has been a change in how news is spread and what medium is more popular to read and look to for information on event and news. I believe that blogging is rising to the top of the mediums that offer people present news on a lot of different areas. Newspapers I feel will be around for a while, because they are traditional, cheap, and educational, however the new generations are learning to lean towards blogging and people are beginning to make their own blogs. Newspapers have been around for a while, and were the main source of how people figured out what was going on around them. In, "From Thomas Paine to Blogs and Beyond", the author states that, "Newspapers flourished throughout the 19th century...The best were aggressive and timely, and ultimately served their readers well...Newspapers have provoked public opinion for as long as they've been around" (Pages 2, 3). Some people can argue however that although these two mediums (journalism vs blogging) are different and conflicting, they can actually help each other out. Ruby Sinreich, a blogger states that, "Political and issue-oriented blogging is made possible largely by the work of professional journalists and researchers. While bloggers tend to be quite discriminating in our choice of media, we often do rely on local and national newspapers as well as specialized outlets for our sources of information" ("Moving Past the Blog vs. Journalism Debate"). I think that overall, with the ongoing debate over journalism vs. blogging, that they both will still influence whoever they are aiming to. Blogging may become more popular just because more and more people are using the Internet in their everyday lives for hours and end, but either way we still get accessible information. So unless you are a journalist or a strong blogger, I don't think you have anything to worry about.


Dow, Dustin, and Jennifer Scroggins. "NCAA Hoops Blog." 30 Mar. 2007. 30 Mar. 2007 .


Gillmor, Dan. "From Tom Paine to Blogs and Beyond." O'Reilly.Com. 30 Mar. 2007 .


Sinreich, Ruby. "Moving Past the "Blogs Versus Journalism" Debate." Lotus Media 2.0. 19 Oct. 2006. 30 Mar. 2007 .

Wieberg, Steve. "For Players' Parents, Few Perks From NCAA." USA Today 30 Mar. 2007, sec. 1A: 1.

Politicians and the Internet

It had to happen sometime; Politicians adapting the use of the Internet to post their obnoxious views on everything under the sun. The Internet is a huge outlet for everyone to gather and post and view peoples' thoughts especially with the help of blogs. To tell you the truth, I am not into politics at all, and before writing this blog couldn't tell you the first thing about them, except that they are very outspoken and have views on everything. I started off my search of looking for a political blog by doing a basic Google search. I came across a website that I thought looked pretty reliable. The URL is http://nbjr.speakupwny.com/, and I have to say that this website did turn out to be a very well constructed political blog. The name of the blog is North Buffalo Journal and Review: My views through a prism of free market values. The blog belongs to Michael Rebmann. Rebmann began posting on this blog in March of 2006, and it clearly has developed into a well established site now with advertisements, and even interactive polls for visitors. Rebmann currently has an ad for Ron Paul, a presidential candidate for 2008, had I never visited this site, I wouldn't have even known who that is, sadly enough; I just am not into politics. Rebmann figured it was his time to start his blog in March of 2006, after posting on others' blogs for a while. "I decided it was time to join the league of bloggers. I have been posting for awhile on other blogs, now I want my own. This page will be updated soon, however, since this is my first day and I’m still busy playing around with all the features..." (Rebmann "About me and this blog"). The blog's date of birth is officially March 16th, 2006. Rebmann is a Paralegal, and is currently just a citizen blogger with a lot to say. His blog rank is Rank: 92,746 (326 links from 45 blogs). The one thing I like about Rebmann's site is that it isn't all about politics, he offers his own photography and recipes for cooking. I must say that before searching for a political blog, I wasn't interested in this at all; I always thought of politicians or people with strong feelings towards politics as annoying. I have to say that Rebmann is not so bad after all. His posts are never too long, and he adds pictures most of the time which make it more attractive to the eye. He is witty and uses some humor which I would have never believe anyone interested in politics would do. Rebmann definitely is internet friendly and that shines bright through his use of the website. He fully accesses the advantages of having an interactive site where he can post his views. He offers links to many interesting sites, and helpful sites at that. He doesn't make the blog boring with plan text, but yet offers interesting pictures he took, and he kind of adds a little humor here and there to some of his posts to keep his audience lively.
In Alinta Thornton's thesis on the growing use of Internet use and politics she states, "There is intense interest in the Internet’s potential to contribute to various sociological phenomena, primarily from American Internet enthusiasts. Foremost among these ideas is that the Internet will contribute to, or even be primarily responsible for, a new era of participatory democracy and a revitalization of the public sphere..." Thornton also mentions something about how now-a-days, politicians and people need to use the new media offered if they want to get ahead. "Instead of reporting on politics, the media are active participants in the political process through their role in publicity. Increasingly, the media has become central to political life. Politicians who do not constantly stay abreast of the media's requirements and actively plan their publicity tend to fall quickly out of favour. Those who are not good 'media performers' suffer the same fate (Thornton "Does Internet Create Democracy?"). Political blogging will continue for however long the internet exists, which seems like forever. People post blogs on meaningless things that no one cares to read about, so why shouldn't people post their political views? They should, so it all works out in the end, people post their views, get comments back, and all is happy.


Rebmann, Michael. North Buffalo Journal and Review. Mar. 2007. WordPress. 25 Mar. 2007 .

Thornton, Alinta. "Does Internet Create Democracy?" Oct. 2002. 25 Mar. 2007 .

Instant Messaging: Easy way to say what's on your mind

A group that I identify myself with, which is entirely mediated by the Internet would be AOL Instant Messaging. AIM opens up a whole new opportunity to talk to people through an exciting different medium. I currently am using AIM Triton, which is the newest version of the instant messaging application. "On September 29, 2006, the newest release of the AIM Triton 1.5 Beta was renamed to AIM 6.0, with a Beta 1 release made available. This version again changed the UI (albeit slightly). The final stable version of AIM 6.0 was released on December 15; new features included connection to AIM Pages, updates that make profile, away message, and general user updates into RSS feeds, new customization, the ability to send messages to users who are offline , buddy list capacity being increased to 1000 buddies, and compatibility with address book programs and sites through a "Universal Address Book" powered by Plaxo" (Wikipedia.org, AOL Instant Messaging).
Through instant messaging, one is allowed to send IM's to another person anywhere in the world, at any time they want. People are also allowed to use chat rooms, where multiple friends or strangers gather to talk to each other. With these interesting outlets in communication, it is apparent that communication is going to strengthen. AIM can strengthen peoples' relationships because it offers something that is new and different. It allows people to physically type out what they want to say, we get to take our time to make sure what we are saying is right, and better yet i can do it in my bath robe waiting for my hair to dry. It is extremely easy to use and I completely prefer speaking to some people on AIM. It is much more comfortable because I don't have to worry about my appearance and I feel that Instant Messaging allows me to get my feelings our easier than in person. The technological development of Instant Messaging applications allows people to speak freely, and more confidently to people anytime they want, anywhere in the world. For example, my friend has a very hard time telling me how he feels about things in person. He gets quite when you ask him anything personal and doesn't know how to verbally word what he wants to say about his emotions. Talk to him online; it's a completely different scenario. I find him much easier to talk to through the AIM application because for some reason, he feels safe behind the computer screen and has more time to type out how he feels. IM is something that is extremely popular among teenagers. "Why do teens flock to IM?...Adolescents have adapted IM technologies to their own needs and purposes...the majority of teenagers have adapted instant messaging in a way that adults have not...the popularity of IM among teens is a result of their need to socialize while confined to their homes..." (Boneva, Quinn, Kraut, Kiesler, Shklovski).
The main way I communicate with people is through instant messaging. The fact that I can see if my friends are available when I need to send them something, and get an instant response makes this technological advance in communication so great. Mediated communication through the use of technology is a great advance for generations to come.



"AOL Instant Messenger." Wikipedia. 20 Mar. 2007. Wikipedia. 20 Mar. 2007 .


Boneva, Bonka, Amy Quinn, Robert Kraut, Sara Kiesler, and Irina Shklovski. "Teenage Communication in the Instant Messaging Era." Carnegie Mellon University. 20 Mar. 2007 .

What would I do without my Google Calendar?

The web application I want to talk about is Google Calendar. Google Calendar is an interactive, and easy way to organize your life with a few clicks of a button. The above hyper-link takes you to the easy accessible website where all you need is a "g mail" account to sign up for your own calendar. I made my own personalized calendar labeled "Emily's Calendar", and what is so great about this site is that it is so easy to follow. I can organize all my events I have throughout the week or month by just clicking on a time slot on the day I have something scheduled. I simply type in my event and there it is, for me to recognize when something is coming up. The website is very much to the point looking. If you know how a regular, hard-copy agenda is set up, then you won't have a problem understanding the lay out of this site.
One great thing about having this interactive calendar, agenda book type thing online is because seeing as how I am always online, I am constantly updating it and being reminded of things to do. Being a busy college student, this interactive site makes it more fun to write down my assignments instead of using the old fashioned pen and paper idea. Some of the benefits of Google Calendars are as follow, "Events are stored online, so in the case of a user's hard drive failure, no data is lost. The application can import Microsoft Outlook calendar files (.csv) and iCalendar files (.ics) (the de facto open calendaring file format), although at this stage only when the fields are all in U.S. format. Multiple calendars can be added and shared, allowing various levels of permissions for the users. This enables collaboration and sharing of schedules between groups or families. There are also general calendars available for importing into one's account which contain national holidays of various countries" (wikipedia.org). The site allows me to name my agenda books anything I want to, and I also can use different colors to make certain events stand out if I want to. TechCrunch offered an interesting quote on how this site is so great, "CL2 makes it easy — even effortless — to keep track of all the events in your life and compare them to what your friends and family have going on in theirs. We’ve designed a calendar that works for you — helping you add events from email, friends, and other public calendars — so you don’t have to spend all your time maintaining your schedule" (techcrunch.com)
Google Calendar is so beneficial because it is free, easy to use and understand, and just extremely helpful in keeping people organized! People love to be interactive on the computer and Google Calendar allows them to be their own organizers on the internet. When i read about Google Calendars I instantly went to the website (www.googlecalendars.com) and set up my calendar using my "g mail" account. Not too many people use Google Calendar because they simply don't know about it. Spread the word, it's easy and fun to use!






Arrington, Michael. "Exclusive Screenshots: Google Calendar." TechCrunch. 8 Mar. 2006. 17 Mar. 2007 .


"Google Calendar." Wikepedia. 7 Mar. 2007. Wikipedia. 17 Mar. 2007 .

"There's a guy at the door with flowers for you, says he found you on Facebook": My concerns about Internet Privacy

Privacy is something everyone is entitled to no matter who they are. Privacy is me wanting to be alone in my room, without my roommate, watching what i want on TV, painting my nails on my bed, and chatting with my friend on the phone about my horrendous Saturday night i would love to forget. Private, deriving from privacy is something that is meant to be known only to the person that is doing the private act, or aware of their private information, such as chatting with a boyfriend, or your credit card account number. Whether or not someone can prevent their privacy being invaded by someone else, is the problem at hand. The Internet is a large community that involves money transactions with account information, personal thoughts or beliefs, personal information,peoples' personal health issues and much more information on any human being that is putting it out there, usually unknowingly, for anyone to see.
Some of the biggest privacy problems posed by the Internet are that just about anyone, with the right directions can hack into almost anyone's Internet history, and one of the biggest problems of all is that we, as a society have absolutely no problem feeding these hackers our personal information, things we would not even tell a best friend, or family member in some cases. With everything from Webshots Community, to Myspace, where you don't need to be a member to see someones homepage, hackers or anyone who doesn't even have necessarily bad intentions can get images of us and personal information from hobbies, to our own birthdays. In "Privacy Lost: Does anybody care?", Bob Sullivan makes these privacy issues clear. "The digital bread crumbs you leave everywhere make it easy for strangers to reconstruct who you are, where you are and what you like. In some cases, a simple Google search can reveal what you think. Like it or not, increasingly we live in a world where you simply cannot keep a secret ("Privacy Lost: Does anybody care?" Sullivan).
I've always thought that the Internet was a little shady in the privacy department, but for some reason I never really gave it any though until this posting. What the hell was I thinking??? There is absolutely no privacy on the Internet, even secured pages I'm sure, can be hacked into. I worry about my Internet privacy, and most importantly with my 5 year old membership to Webshots Community. I made an album on Webshots 5 years ago, and haven't updated it since. I use to post it in my AIM profile so that my friends could just click on a link, and there they were, no password needed to view my public albums. After the pictures got old, new styles were in, and I realized that hair cut I had sophomore year of high school was hideous, I removed the link from my profile, so that no one could see those pictures. To this day, I swear, I STILL get e-mails in my Hotmail account confirming "34 new views of your webshot albums this week". CREEPY!!! I KNOW that my friends aren't looking at these pictures, I don't have the link available for them anymore and I know that my "spaced out" friends would never remember the link address to get to them. So this means, anyone, ANYONE, can be looking at my pictures, old men in their underwear sitting behind the screen, or 10 year old children looking at me funneling a beer. Why don't I just delete my account? That is a good idea, and in fact I am on the website now, doing JUST that, I never took the time to actually think that my pictures of me in my own home doing whatever with my friends is available to anyone on the Internet, anywhere in the world. So is there really "Internet privacy"? Well, according to Wikipedia's article on the matter, they provide the following statements, "Experts in the field of Internet privacy have a consensus that Internet privacy does not really exist" ("Internet Privacy" Wikipedia). Well holy Internet, aren't we all in trouble then?
Privacyrights.org make a clear and true point, "But with acceptance comes a decrease in skepticism. You may assume that the same laws or societal rules that protect your privacy in the physical world apply to the digital world as well. But the Internet remains largely unregulated and the policies governing it underdeveloped. As you continue to embrace the technology it is important to be aware that in many ways it is still uncharted territory" (Privacyrights.org "Privacy in Cyberspace"). This is exactly the case with me, right off the bat of my Internet journey I felt completely at ease, and very secure in my actions on the web. But now, I am older than when I started using the Internet. I make transactions, I have online banking, and I have a Facebook and Myspace account. I need to make sure that I am not putting my whole self out there, because after all, what will i have left of myself to keep private? The Internet is slowly devaluing people's privacy. Just like I don't like someone down the hall barging into my room when I am doing COM 125 homework, or on the phone with my mother talking about a weird rash (humor), I don't want someone hacking into my account history on store websites, or using information they found on me from myspace to locate where I live. Internet Privacy. It's a bitch.


"Internet Privacy." Wikipedia. 11 Feb. 2007. Wikipedia. 15 Feb. 2007 .

"Privacy in Cyberspace." Privacy Rights Clearing House. Oct. 2006. Privacy Rights Clearing House. 15 Feb. 2007 .

Sullivan, Bob. "Privacy Lost: Does Anybody Care Anymore?" MSNBC.Com. 17 Oct. 2006. Technology Correspondent. 15 Feb. 2007 .

COM 125 Week 4: You Get What You Give

"Gift Economy", although sounding like a term you should study for your next economics exam, a gift economy is something almost everyone takes part in. One gift economy I take part in would have to be Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that offers free information and definitions on any kind of topic you could think of. In fact Wikipedia.org provides a definition of exactly what it practices, free software, as, "Free software...is software which can be used, copied, studied, modified and redistributed with little or no restriction beyond the requirement that source code must be made available It is on the web to help people, and is not asking for anything in return" (Wikipedia.org Free Software Foundation "Free Software"). Wikipedia has been there for me whenever I had to write papers, give presentations, or just wanted to learn about something in a simple, clear definition. Frequently updated and ever-changing, this website accomadates to our fastly-growing generation. Not many encyclopedias can you search the term "P-Diddy" and "World War I" in the same one. Although I can't physically give Wikipedia.org a "gift" back, I can acknowledge its helpfulness in my papers, and i often refer people to the popular website for help, given they haven't heard of it, which would be unlikely.
In Peter Kollock's, "The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace", he states that, "The relative or absolute anonymity of the recipient makes it all the more remarkable that individuals volunteer valuable information – one cannot realistically count on the reciprocity of the recipient in the future to balance the gift that has occurred." The former quote is making a point to how amazing it is that these people who work for Wikipedia.org are doing all this hard work, of constantly updating their website and handing out free information for nothing in return. I think in interent gift economnies, one is not as pressured to reciprocate a gift to a giver, than they are in friendship, or relational gift economies. The fact that the giver is unknown, and not known on a close, personal level, makes their giving of the information in their encyclopedia less attached to an actual human being, therefore the millions of college students who use their website aren't able to always reciprocate. Even my posting on this topic, on my blog is another example of a gift economy i take part in. Richard Barbook, put it simply when he commented on blogging as a new form of gift economy saying, "When I was writing The Hi-Tech Gift Economy, the open source movement was the iconic example of non-commercial production over the Net. In the intervening period, blogging has become the public face of this new way of working. What was once the preserve of a small minority is now a mass phenomenon" (Barbook, The Hi-Tech Gift Economy).
Gift economies are a common practice on the internet, and in our day-to-day lives. I belive that gift economies that offer free software such as, Wikipedia.org, or Blogger.com, are great ways to help people out who need information fast. One good thing about the internet is that is it always changing, and updating to be the most recent version that correlates to the present day, and that's why Wikipedia.org is more helpful than an old, dusty, encyclopedia I would have to travel to the library to get. I personally feel that Wikipedia.org is one of the best free software agents out there. It is well known, and covers so many terms, it also offers different languages for people from different language speaking regions.

Barbook, Richard. "The Hi-Tech Economy." First Monday. 1998. 9 Feb. 2007 .


"Free Software." Wikipedia.Org. 3 Feb. 2007. Wikipedia. 9 Feb. 2007 .

Kollock, Peter. "The Economies of Online Cooperation:." 1999. University of California, Los Angeles. 9 Feb. 2007 .